{"id":144,"date":"2026-05-19T19:36:06","date_gmt":"2026-05-19T19:36:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cambridgemovinghub.com\/?p=144"},"modified":"2026-05-19T19:36:06","modified_gmt":"2026-05-19T19:36:06","slug":"council-drops-shotspotter-in-close-vote","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cambridgemovinghub.com\/?p=144","title":{"rendered":"Council drops ShotSpotter in close vote"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

The City Council voted Monday night to pull the plug on ShotSpotter, a\u00a0controversial police surveillance technology in use in Cambridge for more than a decade. The move came after extended public comment and nearly an hour of deliberation, with intense distrust\u00a0of the current federal administration a factor in approving the policy order.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Read more Cambridge councillors take a stand on Cuba but not foreign policy, mayoral election<\/a><\/p>\n

The policy order to remove ShotSpotter first appeared on the council\u2019s agenda last week but was delayed when vice mayor Burhan Azeem exercised his charter right, citing emotions running high during a meeting that started mere hours after a shooting on Memorial Drive left a gunman and two victims hospitalized.\u00a0<\/p>\n

ShotSpotter uses a network of microphones to alert law enforcement when a high decibel sound potentially indicating a gunshot is recorded.\u00a0It\u00a0was first deployed by the Cambridge Police Department (CPD) in June of 2014.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe shouldn\u2019t frame safety only through surveillance or policing. We have to be expansive,\u201d said Councillor Ayah Al-Zubi, who chairs the public safety committee and was the lead sponsor of the policy order. Councillors Marc\u00a0McGovern, Patty Nolan and Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler co-sponsored the order. All four ultimately voted in favor of the order, along with Mayor Sumbul Siddiqui.\u00a0<\/p>\n

The vote bucked requests from both city manager Yi-An Huang and acting police commissioner Pauline Wells to keep ShotSpotter.\u00a0Huang acknowledged that ShotSpotter was not \u201ca perfect tool\u201d and had tradeoffs, but that ShotSpotter didn\u2019t need to always be accurate to be effective.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhen you look at the data a slightly different way, this is actually allowing [police] to respond more quickly, and that\u2019s what we\u2019ve been hearing from our police leadership,\u201d Huang said.<\/p>\n

Wells spoke ahead of the vote and answered questions from city councillors, cited a shooting\u00a0on Harvard Street in July 2024 in which no 911 call had occurred. Wells said officers found a 48-year-old man with a gunshot wound to his upper thigh.\u00a0She also invoked the Memorial Drive shooting in imploring the council to vote down the policy order.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u201cLast Monday\u2019s incident was\u00a0as\u00a0anomaly, and frankly, we\u2019ve been lucky. But lucky is not a strategy,\u201d Wells said. \u201cWe are literally going into a community meeting tomorrow night and telling them that the city of Cambridge voted down gunshot detection technology after an active shooter event. Why wouldn\u2019t we want to keep our community as safe as possible?\u201d<\/p>\n

In both cases Wells cited, though, ShotSpotter was either not solely responsible or not a factor at all in police response. CPD staff have confirmed with Cambridge Day that last week\u2019s shooting on Memorial Drive occurred outside of ShotSpotter\u2019s range. As for the July 2024 shooting on Harvard Street, CPD\u2019s own report confirms that while a ShotSpotter alert was triggered, a patrol unit had also\u00a0overheard the gunshots\u00a0and dispatched toward the scene. ShotSpotter activation wasn\u2019t mentioned in the day\u2019s\u00a0daily log\u00a0of police activity.<\/p>\n

The policy order asks the city manager to direct CPD to turn off and physically remove ShotSpotter microphones within 90 days. Councillors Timothy Flaherty and E. Denise Simmons voted against it, while Azeem and councillor Cathie Zusy voted \u201cpresent.\u201d<\/p>\n

Public discomfort with surveillance<\/h2>\n

About 30 people came in person or called in during public comment, and all voiced their opposition to ShotSpotter.\u00a0They cited the city\u2019s lack of control over how ShotSpotter\u2019s data is used, the program\u2019s potential to over-police people of color, and an overall discomfort with surveillance technology as reasons for why they thought the city should discontinue its use.<\/p>\n

Some commenters were concerned that ShotSpotter\u2019s high false positive rate, which according to CPD has been 65% over the duration of its use in Cambridge, causes police officers to be on guard when dispatched to a location.<\/p>\n

Cambridge resident Rachel Bickelman said she was concerned by \u201chow quickly these situations can escalate when there\u2019s \u2026 police with firearms involved in a chaotic moment.\u201d She said she was worried ShotSpotter could lead to \u201cunnecessary and preventable violence.\u201d<\/p>\n

Multiple commenters played voice recordings of Cambridge residents who said they were afraid of coming to public comment in person out of fear of retaliation.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Dana Grottenstein shared a recording of a comment made in Spanish by a Cambridge resident who identified herself as Sandra. Grottenstein translated remarks saying residents of public housing like Sandra did not come to public comment because they \u201chave felt watched, and we have felt punished whenever we have complained or spoken out against something. I do not want these machines recording us. Get these microphones out of our neighborhoods.\u201d<\/p>\n

Some who provided voice notes through their in-person intermediaries mentioned having \u201cmixed status\u201d households, meaning that someone in their household could be subject to deportation. They worried about ShotSpotter microphones \u201clistening in on immigrant communities.\u201d<\/p>\n

Alex Marthews, co-chair of Digital Fourth, a civil liberties group, translated a recording of a woman who identified herself as Angela and said \u201cI fear for my situation every day. This secret surveillance isn\u2019t abstract. It is a real threat.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read more Films on relationships, one remarkable, one nightmarish<\/a><\/p>\n

Former mayor Anthony Galluccio was not at public comment but shared with Cambridge Day a letter sent to the city council and Huang. The letter spoke out against ICE\u2019s \u201ctrampling of due process\u201d but asked councillors not to let anger at the Trump administration drive their votes. \u201cPlease pause and think about how to control the use of technology but not eliminate it,\u201d the letter said, adding that local government \u201cis responsible for protecting us.\u201d<\/p>\n

There is no evidence that ShotSpotter maker SoundThinking has supplied data, including recordings of conversations its microphones are capable of picking up, to the federal government. But the Trump administration has confirmed its purchase of commercially available location data on people residing in the U.S. from other companies to aid in investigations.<\/p>\n

\u201dSecurity theater\u201d<\/h2>\n

After public comment, councillors spent nearly an hour discussing the policy order. Some struck a conciliatory tone, acknowledging the variety of viewpoints on council.<\/p>\n

\u201cI\u2019m not going to say that anybody who votes to keep [ShotSpotter] doesn\u2019t care. That\u2019s cheap, that\u2019s political, and we should do better,\u201d said McGovern.<\/p>\n

Councillors in favor of the policy order to remove ShotSpotter said the technology was ineffective.<\/p>\n

\u201cIn terms of what we tell the community tomorrow, I hope we can tell them that we\u2019re using things that work,\u201d said Sobrinho-Wheeler, in response to Wells\u2019s remarks. \u201cLet\u2019s actually use proven technologies \u2026 rather than some security theater.\u201d<\/p>\n

The council also voted last October to stop use of Flock, whose technology scans license plates. But others didn\u2019t want to ditch the technology altogether without an alternative in place.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe argument in favor is that it may help the police or law enforcement in gathering sufficient evidence, so that even in the absence of witnesses testimony, we can hold people accountable,\u201d said Simmons. As for privacy concerns, she said \u201cIf you\u2019re on your phone, you walk past a Tesla, a Ring doorbell \u2026 We\u2019re being surveilled all the time, whether we like it or not.\u201d<\/p>\n

Some councillors thought public concern that ShotSpotter could report to Immigrations and Custom Enforcement (ICE) were overblown.<\/p>\n

\u201cI think it\u2019s a false narrative to think that federal agents are monitoring conversations that are overheard by ShotSpotter,\u201d said Flaherty.<\/p>\n

At least one public commenter misattributed the funding the city gets for ShotSpotter to ICE. Cambridge\u2019s ShotSpotter program has been funded through grant money the city of Boston receives through the Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA). FEMA and ICE are both part of the Department of Homeland Security.<\/p>\n

Simmons made a motion to table the policy order in favor of a compromise that would direct the city to re-write its contract with SoundThinking to restrict how the company is allowed to use data collected on Cambridge residents. The motion failed by a 5-4 vote, with Azeem, Flaherty, Simmons, and Zusy voting in favor and the other five councillors voting against.<\/p>\n

McGovern said the risks simply outweighed the benefits.<\/p>\n

\u201cI don\u2019t think [ShotSpotter] is listening to everybody at their kitchen table, nor do I think the city is going to be less safe without it,\u201d he said. For him, the decision to remove ShotSpotter came down to \u201cthe access of the information not being in our hands. And under this current federal administration, that\u2019s scary.\u201d<\/p>\n

Advocates who spoke in favor of dismantling ShotSpotter could be seen high fiving each other in the hallway outside of council chambers immediately following the vote.<\/p>\n

Marthews, the Digital Fourth co-chair called the vote a \u201cwise decision based on a sober consideration of the evidence.\u201d \u201cShotSpotter has never been shown to reduce gun violence, and it is better for the city to not have rolling audio monitoring of its citizens as they pass by about their daily lives.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read more Why Cambridge needs social housing<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The City Council voted Monday night to pull the plug on ShotSpotter, a\u00a0controversial police surveillance technology in use in Cambridge for more than a decade. The move came after extended public comment and nearly an hour of deliberation, with intense distrust\u00a0of the current federal administration a factor in approving the policy order.\u00a0 Read more Cambridge […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":143,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[14,8,20],"class_list":["post-144","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-city-council","tag-cambridge-city-council","tag-public-safety","tag-technology"],"yoast_head":"\nCouncil drops ShotSpotter in close vote - Cambridge Moving Hub<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/cambridgemovinghub.com\/?p=144\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Council drops ShotSpotter in close vote - Cambridge Moving Hub\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The City Council voted Monday night to pull the plug on ShotSpotter, a\u00a0controversial police surveillance technology in use in Cambridge for more than a decade. The move came after extended public comment and nearly an hour of deliberation, with intense distrust\u00a0of the current federal administration a factor in approving the policy order.\u00a0 Read more Cambridge […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/cambridgemovinghub.com\/?p=144\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Cambridge Moving Hub\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-05-19T19:36:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cambridgemovinghub.com\\\/?p=144#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cambridgemovinghub.com\\\/?p=144\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cambridgemovinghub.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/5fd5ad832d9b2ddb71a83fd908922373\"},\"headline\":\"Council drops ShotSpotter in close vote\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-19T19:36:06+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cambridgemovinghub.com\\\/?p=144\"},\"wordCount\":1503,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cambridgemovinghub.com\\\/?p=144#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cambridgemovinghub.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/d28e6c742e64208913cd311bc855edbe.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Cambridge City Council\",\"public safety\",\"technology\"],\"articleSection\":[\"City Council\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/cambridgemovinghub.com\\\/?p=144#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cambridgemovinghub.com\\\/?p=144\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cambridgemovinghub.com\\\/?p=144\",\"name\":\"Council drops ShotSpotter in close vote - Cambridge Moving Hub\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cambridgemovinghub.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cambridgemovinghub.com\\\/?p=144#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cambridgemovinghub.com\\\/?p=144#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cambridgemovinghub.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/d28e6c742e64208913cd311bc855edbe.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-19T19:36:06+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cambridgemovinghub.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/5fd5ad832d9b2ddb71a83fd908922373\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cambridgemovinghub.com\\\/?p=144#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/cambridgemovinghub.com\\\/?p=144\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cambridgemovinghub.com\\\/?p=144#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cambridgemovinghub.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/d28e6c742e64208913cd311bc855edbe.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cambridgemovinghub.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/d28e6c742e64208913cd311bc855edbe.jpg\",\"width\":1024,\"height\":1183},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cambridgemovinghub.com\\\/?p=144#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cambridgemovinghub.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Council drops ShotSpotter in close vote\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cambridgemovinghub.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cambridgemovinghub.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cambridge Moving Hub\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cambridgemovinghub.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cambridgemovinghub.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/5fd5ad832d9b2ddb71a83fd908922373\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/cambridgemovinghub.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/cambridgemovinghub.com\\\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Council drops ShotSpotter in close vote - Cambridge Moving Hub","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/cambridgemovinghub.com\/?p=144","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Council drops ShotSpotter in close vote - Cambridge Moving Hub","og_description":"The City Council voted Monday night to pull the plug on ShotSpotter, a\u00a0controversial police surveillance technology in use in Cambridge for more than a decade. The move came after extended public comment and nearly an hour of deliberation, with intense distrust\u00a0of the current federal administration a factor in approving the policy order.\u00a0 Read more Cambridge […]","og_url":"https:\/\/cambridgemovinghub.com\/?p=144","og_site_name":"Cambridge Moving Hub","article_published_time":"2026-05-19T19:36:06+00:00","author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/cambridgemovinghub.com\/?p=144#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/cambridgemovinghub.com\/?p=144"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/cambridgemovinghub.com\/#\/schema\/person\/5fd5ad832d9b2ddb71a83fd908922373"},"headline":"Council drops ShotSpotter in close vote","datePublished":"2026-05-19T19:36:06+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/cambridgemovinghub.com\/?p=144"},"wordCount":1503,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/cambridgemovinghub.com\/?p=144#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/cambridgemovinghub.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/d28e6c742e64208913cd311bc855edbe.jpg","keywords":["Cambridge City Council","public safety","technology"],"articleSection":["City Council"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/cambridgemovinghub.com\/?p=144#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/cambridgemovinghub.com\/?p=144","url":"https:\/\/cambridgemovinghub.com\/?p=144","name":"Council drops ShotSpotter in close vote - Cambridge Moving Hub","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/cambridgemovinghub.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/cambridgemovinghub.com\/?p=144#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/cambridgemovinghub.com\/?p=144#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/cambridgemovinghub.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/d28e6c742e64208913cd311bc855edbe.jpg","datePublished":"2026-05-19T19:36:06+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/cambridgemovinghub.com\/#\/schema\/person\/5fd5ad832d9b2ddb71a83fd908922373"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/cambridgemovinghub.com\/?p=144#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/cambridgemovinghub.com\/?p=144"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/cambridgemovinghub.com\/?p=144#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/cambridgemovinghub.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/d28e6c742e64208913cd311bc855edbe.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/cambridgemovinghub.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/d28e6c742e64208913cd311bc855edbe.jpg","width":1024,"height":1183},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/cambridgemovinghub.com\/?p=144#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/cambridgemovinghub.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Council drops ShotSpotter in close vote"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/cambridgemovinghub.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/cambridgemovinghub.com\/","name":"Cambridge Moving Hub","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/cambridgemovinghub.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/cambridgemovinghub.com\/#\/schema\/person\/5fd5ad832d9b2ddb71a83fd908922373","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50b1ad2e498f523425ee0a8cc5180a210646db1622662a3d56cc405d3e0c346a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/cambridgemovinghub.com"],"url":"https:\/\/cambridgemovinghub.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cambridgemovinghub.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/144","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cambridgemovinghub.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cambridgemovinghub.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cambridgemovinghub.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cambridgemovinghub.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=144"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cambridgemovinghub.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/144\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cambridgemovinghub.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/143"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cambridgemovinghub.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=144"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cambridgemovinghub.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=144"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cambridgemovinghub.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=144"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}